Minority Report vs. AI Reality: How to Manage Global AI Risk

Introduction

AI presents massive opportunities—and equally massive risks.
Many compliance leaders dream of using AI to detect misconduct before it happens. But the regulatory reality is far from science fiction.

‍

The U.S. View: Encouragement

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)recently called for proactive risk management in AI.
Many global companies are leveraging AI to fight financial crime, predict risks, and improve oversight.

‍

The EU View: Prohibition

Then comes the shock:
The EU AI Act explicitly prohibits predictive criminal profiling of individuals.

Even if your AI focuses on transaction monitoring, it’s likely to be labeled a “high-risk AI system”, triggering obligations such as:

‍
- Ex-ante conformity assessments
- Continuous human oversight
- Incident reporting
- Detailed documentation

‍

The Takeaway: What’s Legal in One Country Might Be Illegal in Another

What the U.S. allows, the EU restricts.This regulatory divergence is the new global reality.
Just as Yahoo! France had to block Nazi memorabilia despite U.S. First Amendment protections, AI governance today requires region-specific strategies.

‍

GlisRisk’s Role

We help large enterprises:
- Quantify AI-related regulatory exposure
- Apply the right compliance frameworks
- Balance innovation with accountability
- Deploy AI strategically and globally

‍

Conclusion

You want to harness AI for integrity, growth, and efficiency.
We help you do it within the legal bounds—everywhere.

If your AI ambitions go beyond borders, you need a global risk intelligence partner.

Let’s build that bridge.

‍